<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Review: Dragon Age: Origins</title> <atom:link href="http://newbreview.com/2009/11/05/review-dragon-age-origins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://newbreview.com/2009/11/05/review-dragon-age-origins/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 14:04:39 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: ac</title><link>http://newbreview.com/2009/11/05/review-dragon-age-origins/comment-page-1/#comment-1447</link> <dc:creator>ac</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 17:26:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://newbreview.com/?p=612#comment-1447</guid> <description>I&#039;d like to add that I was googling on some more opinions on DA:O that felt like I felt about it. One of them mentions that less known but recent RPG game called Risen (PC version) would be better than DA:O. I&#039;ll check it out. Thought I&#039;d just share this incase anyone else was disappointed with DA:O and wanted to try something else.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to add that I was googling on some more opinions on DA:O that felt like I felt about it. One of them mentions that less known but recent RPG game called Risen (PC version) would be better than DA:O. I&#8217;ll check it out. Thought I&#8217;d just share this incase anyone else was disappointed with DA:O and wanted to try something else.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ac</title><link>http://newbreview.com/2009/11/05/review-dragon-age-origins/comment-page-1/#comment-1444</link> <dc:creator>ac</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 12:40:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://newbreview.com/?p=612#comment-1444</guid> <description>Dragon Age. Good example of &quot;quantity over quality&quot;. The great voice acting barely makes the generally bland dialogue bearable. There&#039;s couple excellent characters and while the lines are not nearly really as cringeworthy thought as Fallout 3/Oblivion/latest Star Wars movies, the effect is the same in the end. It&#039;s just hard to sit through it for hours on end.On positive note, there&#039;s a little more to the combat than the awful ME2 combat, sore point of which waas the predictable cover spots at every point. There&#039;s a lot of combat and random encounters here, and if there wasn&#039;t people would, guaranteed, fall asleep during the bland dialogue. Compare that to ME&#039;s dialogue where you don&#039;t feel uncomfortable watching the lines play in YouTube without the game! Can&#039;t say same for DA.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dragon Age. Good example of &#8220;quantity over quality&#8221;. The great voice acting barely makes the generally bland dialogue bearable. There&#8217;s couple excellent characters and while the lines are not nearly really as cringeworthy thought as Fallout 3/Oblivion/latest Star Wars movies, the effect is the same in the end. It&#8217;s just hard to sit through it for hours on end.</p><p>On positive note, there&#8217;s a little more to the combat than the awful ME2 combat, sore point of which waas the predictable cover spots at every point. There&#8217;s a lot of combat and random encounters here, and if there wasn&#8217;t people would, guaranteed, fall asleep during the bland dialogue. Compare that to ME&#8217;s dialogue where you don&#8217;t feel uncomfortable watching the lines play in YouTube without the game! Can&#8217;t say same for DA.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/6 queries in 0.035 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 320/321 objects using disk: basic

Served from: newbreview.com @ 2012-05-23 22:26:48 -->
